Rep. Patrick Murphy (D), who is running for the U.S. Senate in Florida and prides himself in stating that he is a pro-Choice, may have been an abortionist in another lifetime.

While Grayson’s senate campaign is all-but dead in the water, Murphy’s is not, and he is expected to win the primary race and go on to face pro-Life Republican Senator Marco Rubio in the November general election.

In case you are wondering what Rubio thinks about Murphy, well, here is just a snippet of what runs through his mind when asked about Patrick Murphy:

take our poll - story continues below

Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?(2)

• Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?  

• Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?*
  • Yes.
  • Yes, but only parts.
  • Not a chance.
• Email*
• Comments
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Completing this poll grants you access to Shark Tank updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

“There’s three things about Patrick Murphy. No. 1, he’s lazy – he’s not a very hard worker. He’s not a guy that you can see his campaign, he barely does events, he kind of just is phoning it in, and I think he feels entitled to it.
 
“Number 2, he’s a very privileged guy. His whole life his family has provided for him. He’s never had to worry a single moment of his life about how to pay his bills or where his next money is going to come from. His dad, in fact, gave him $5 million dollars after he was elected to Congress.

“And the third thing is, if you look at his voting record it’s atrocious. Yesterday we get the news that all these people are being released from Guantanamo and he supports all that, closing Guantanamo. He supports the Iran deal. Yesterday he said Hillary Clinton is someone who is trustworthy. …”

CLICK HERE IF YOU ARE YOU PRO-LIFE?

Biden has campaigned with Murphy in Florida and Obama as promoted the “strong progressor” in a campaign video ad where he says that as president, he has been able to count on Murphy to protect a woman’s “right to choose.”

Even some national pro-abortion groups like NARAL and Planned Parenthood Action Fund have endorsed Murphy.

But while no one is questioning Murphy’s pro-choice bona fides, especially considering that he has voted against every bill presented to him that is remotely pro-Life, or has voted in favor of any bill that was pro-Choice, did you know that Murphy co-sponsored legislation that supported late-term abortions?

Just last year, Murphy even took to the House floor to denounce pro-Life legislation, asking that Republicans focus on the “economy” and not on “bills that divide this House and this country.”

And then there is the hypocrisy.

Back on November 11, 2013, a “divisive”  H.R. 3471 was co-sponsored by Rep. Murphy (D) and introduced to make  it “unlawful” for government to ban late-term, or partial-birth abortions.

Here is how the bill reads:

SEC. 4. PROHIBITED MEASURES AND ACTIONS.

(1) A requirement that a medical professional perform specific tests or follow specific medical procedures in connection with the provision of an abortion, unless generally required for the provision of medically comparable procedures.

(2) A limitation on an abortion provider’s ability to delegate tasks, other than a limitation generally applicable to providers of medically comparable procedures.

(3) A limitation on an abortion provider’s ability to prescribe or dispense drugs based on her or his good-faith medical judgment, other than a limitation generally applicable to the medical profession.

(4) A limitation on an abortion provider’s ability to provide abortion services via telemedicine, other than a limitation generally applicable to the provision of medical services via telemedicine.

(6) A requirement that, prior to obtaining an abortion, a woman make one or more medically unnecessary visits to the provider of abortion services or to any individual or entity that does not provide abortion services.

(7) A requirement or limitation that prohibits or restricts medical training for abortion procedures, other than a requirement or limitation generally applicable to medical training for medically comparable procedures.

This bill, which Republicans have called “Roe vs. Wade on steroids,” has yet to be voted on, and would surely be defeated in the House. The Senate version of this bill, would most likely be defeated as well.

Other bills Murphy has voted against:

HR 3504 – Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

HR 3134 – Defund Planned Parenthood Act of 2015