After President Obama ignorantly stated that Republicans were afraid of “widows and orphans” that were among the thousands of the refugees fleeing Syria to be allowed to enter the United States, even after it was learned that one of the Paris attackers was a refugee that recently arrived from Syria, the House GOP quickly voted and passed a measure to halt Obama’s plan to bring in scores of these unvetted refugees into the country.Even though a number of House Democrats backed the Republican sponsored bill, Obama’s liberal Democratic lieutenants in the House of Representatives, namely Rep. Alan Grayson, went on the attack to defend and double-down on the President’s resentment towards Republicans.
In his most recent “Alan Grayson’s Emails,” Grayson attacks his fellow Democratic colleague in the House and Senate primary opponent, Rep. Patrick Murphy, over his support to keep the Syrian refugees out of the U.S.
While blasting Murphy and Republicans for supposedly giving into the fear that Terrorists have been trying to instill, Grayson forgets to remind readers why is it that these terrorists do what they do.
Grayson says that these radical Islamist terrorist don’t want to change anyone’s religion, just commit acts of terror.
So what is the reasoning for committing these terrorist acts in the first place?Why are these terrorists heard yelling “Allahu Akbar!” while committing these acts of terror?
It is obvious that these acts of terror are being committed in the name of religion, and many, if not all of the terrorism being committed by radical Islamists in Syria, Iraq, and in other regions of the world, are being done to people who are not Muslim, do not abide by Sharia Law, or do not conform with the Jihadis’ twisted ideology.
Grayson’s email gets better.
The self-proclaimed “Congressman with Guts” then goes on to blame Americans for the act of terror these Jihadists commit, saying that, “We will end terrorism when we are able to overcome our fear, and have the courage to be humane. Without terror, there can be no terrorism.”
In other words, Grayson is saying that this so-called “fear” that he and Obama say the Republican have of letting in all of those “widows and orphans” from Syria, is the root cause of radical Islamic terrorism.Grayson then goes on to compare the Syria refugee crisis to the European refugee crisis after Nazi Germany began its reign of terror across that continent.
Our country chose fear over compassion when we rejected refugees from Europe fleeing Nazism. Fearmongers said that there might be Nazis among the masses. We know what happened after that.
So, let’s talk about these “widows and orphans” Grayson and Obama are using to terrorize Americans into believing that they are fueling radical Islamist terrorism by not allowing these refugees into the U.S.
Even before that attacks in Paris, many of the wives of slain Jihadists has been have been taking up arms to avenge their spouses deaths, all in the name of Islam.
The wives of Isis militants killed in coalition airstrikes could engage in ‘black widow’ suicide bombing missions, according to a study by a leading think tank.Research by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue draws comparisons between the women whose husbands have been killed by coalition airstrikes in Iraq and Syria and the Chechnyan ‘black widows’ whose husbands or relatives were killed in the war with Russia and went on to take up suicide missions.
Considering what our intelligence agencies are telling us about the potential of radical Islamists already having infiltrated the Syrian refugee population, are we to believe President Obama and Rep. Alan Grayson when they tell us that all of these poor “widows and orphans” do not pose a threat to the sovereignty of the United States, and as a nation we must allow them all to enter the country?
Is it naive to believe that among all of these refugees that there isn’t one of these so-called “Black Widows” crawling around within the masses?