Now the Jane Doe lawsuit may compel the former president to testify under oath about what he was doing there.
The New York Post reported that Hillary is furious Bill is mired in the scandal. Her leadership of the infamously aggressive 1992 “Bimbo Eruptions” squad is already nipping at the edges of her presidential aspirations. Worried her husband’s Epstein connection may snare her campaign, you can expect orchestrated push back from the Clinton camp.Enter Michael Wolff, an Epstein confidant and supposed journalist (Wolff now writes a regular column for British GQ), who recently penned a withering, faux-flummoxed attack in USA Today pooh-poohing the “new age” media and the American legal system, along with Epstein’s persistent “Jane Doe” accusers and their respected Florida attorneys.
Wolff exudes the condescension and indignation that is the hallmark of elite deviant cover-up artists rushing to excuse one of their own. His flustered, navel-gazing essay skips right over the part about his child-molesting pal Jeffrey Epstein’s buying himself and his confederates a free-pass from any real criminal punishment for heinous child sex crimes.
Do you think the 2nd Amendment will be destroyed by the Biden Administration?(2)
In the January 11 article, Wolff leaps right to the offensive against those forces, whether human or systemic, that he believes unduly besmirched Epstein’s elite sex cronies Alan Dershowitz and Britain’s Prince Andrew.
Wolff paints the whole thing in conspiratorial terms: “all part of a scripted game,” he writes, but neglects to disclose to USA Today’s readers his own skin in the game: his courtesan-esque coziness and nearly two-decade (and presumably continuing) personal relationship with the billionaire child molestor himself.
Maybe Wolff forgets the 2007 New York magazine piece by Jeffrey Weiss delving into Epstein’s well-insulated personal fiefdom, with Wolff in the role of gushing, star-struck Epstein sycophant. The article further describes Epstein as a “discreet confidant to Wolff … when Wolff was involved in a bid for New York Magazine.”“It was all a little giddy”, the article quotes Wolff as saying, describing his late 90’s entre into Epstein’s surreal fantasy life, as he boarded Epstein’s “beautiful 727” for a flight full of elites to a West Coast conference.
Jeffrey is living a life that once might have been prized and admired and valued, but its moment has passed … I think the culture has outgrown it. You can’t describe it without being held to severe account. It’s not allowed. It may be allowed if you’re secretive and furtive, but Jeffrey is anything but secretive and furtive. I think it represents an achievement to Jeffrey.
Apparently for Michael Wolff it is only a no-no to describe a degenerate criminal lifestyle such as Epstein’s, but not necessarily to actually live it, in which case “it may be allowed” as long as it remains covert.
Not to be too obvious exonerating Epstein, Wolff is quoted offering Epstein counsel on how to be less obvious about his pedophilia: “He has never been secretive about the girls … At one point, when his troubles began, he was talking to me and said, ‘What can I say, I like young girls.’ I said, ‘Maybe you should say, ‘I like young women.'”
Noble advice from a loyal friend.Fast forwarding to 2015, Wolff’s USA Today editorial decrying public accusations against Epstein pals Dershowitz and the Prince is chock full of similarly subtle, almost subliminal, sophistry – and totally free of any supporting factual substance.
For example, he claims the Florida Jane Doe case advancing against Epstein and his pedophile pals is “unpromising” and “the allegations do not derive from law enforcement personnel making charges related to an investigation; rather, they come entirely from someone filing a lawsuit in an effort to win compensation and damages.”
Wolff treats the case as if it is not a bold-faced public fact that the Palm Beach Police, led by Chief Michael Reiter, publicly expressed outrage and dismay at the miscarriage of justice in Epstein’s so-called prosecution and his subsequent federal non-prosecution.
For over a year, Reiter and his department had compiled a case against Epstein based on sworn statements establishing Epstein’s repeated sexual abuse of five young girls. Other evidence indicated Epstein’s abuse of up to 35 other underage female victims.
These law enforcement personnel would likely disagree with Wolff’s implication that there is nothing more to the case than Epstein’s one-count solicitation of a minor conviction and the negligible punishment arranged for Epstein between Dershowitz and Barry Krischer, the Florida State’s Attorney.Wolff would do well to look into a California civil case a few years ago involving a civil defendant named O.J. Simpson who was found liable for murder where the criminal justice system found him not guilty. Should the federal government undertake the duty it has so-far shirked to pursue Epstein’s interstate child sex trafficking allegations, Wolff may yet eat his words.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.