Quantcast
Shark Tank
us_customs_and_border_protection

New Immigration Bill Places U.S. Military Under the Command of Homeland Security?

By JAVIER MANJARRES

us_customs_and_border_protectionAdditional questions and concerns about the U.S. Senate’s bipartisan immigration reform bill, The Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act continue to swirl among critics of the proposed legislation, and now some are questioning whether the legislation would subordinate the the U.S. military and place it under direction of the Department of Homeland Security.

The bill is said to strengthen border security, and has given the American people, who have been asking for the U.S. Military to be positioned along the Southern border, the belief that the U.S. Military will be placed on the border to, in essence, ‘shut down’ the border.

But the bill doesn’t guarantee that this will happen. The bill states that “with the approval of the Secretary of Defense, the Governor of a State may order units or personnel of the National Guard” to assist with border security or other “missions.”

So, if authorized by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, it would be up to Governors Perry of Texas, Jan Brewer of Arizona, and Martinez of New Mexico, to deploy their state’s respective national guard units to the border region.

Keep in mind that the “Southwest Border Region” has been identified by the Department of Homeland Security of being the land that is within 100 miles from the U.S.-Mexico border. This would means that the city of Tucson, Arizona, as well as the California cities of San Diego, Oceanside, and even cities as far north as Mission Viejo, are all situated within the 100 mile border region.

The bill also mandates that the National Guard, if deployed, would assist the U.S. Customs and Border Protection with border protection, and their duties would include, helping construct any and all border fencing, increase ground-based mobile surveillance, and deploying “additional unmanned aerial systems and manned aircraft sufficient to maintain continuous surveillance of the Southern Border.”

But then the bill specifically outlines that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection roll alongside the U.S. Military would include the deployment of  “additional mobile, video, and agent-portable surveillance systems, and unmanned aerial vehicles in the Southwest Border region as necessary to provide 24-hour operation and surveillance,” as well as  “operate unarmed unmanned aerial vehicles” and “deploy unarmed additional fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters along the Southern border.”

It is unclear whether the U.S. military will  cease using armed drones and helicopters when working alongside the U.S. Border Patrol or if it will be ordered to follow an almost non-existent domestic ‘Rules of Engagement’ policy.  Note that the bill does not specify if the “unarmed helicopters” would be allowed to have armed military personnel aboard the aircraft or if it simply means that the aircraft is fitted with weapons.


Here’s the language of the bill as it currently reads-

SEC. 1103. NATIONAL GUARD SUPPORT TO SECURE THE SOUTHERN BORDER.

(a) IN GENERAL.—With the approval of the Secretary of Defense, the Governor of a State may order any units or personnel of the National Guard of such State to perform operations and missions under section 502(f) of title 32, United States Code, in the Southwest Border region for the purposes of assisting U.S. Customs and Border Protection in securing the Southern border. (b) ASSIGNMENT OF OPERATIONS AND MISSIONS.— (1) IN GENERAL.—National Guard units and

personnel deployed under subsection (a) may be assigned such operations and missions specified in subsection (c) as may be necessary to secure the Southern border. (2)

 NATURE OF DUTY.—The duty of National Guard personnel performing operations and missions described in paragraph (1) shall be full-time duty under title 32, United States Code.

 (c) RANGE OF OPERATIONS AND MISSIONS.—The operations and missions assigned under subsection (b) shall include the temporary authority— (1) to construct fencing, including double-layer and triple-layer fencing; (2) to increase ground-based mobile surveillance systems; (3) to deploy additional unmanned aerial systems and manned aircraft sufficient to maintain continuous surveillance of the Southern Border;

(4) to deploy and provide capability for radio  communications interoperability between U.S. Customs and Border Protection and State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies; (5) to construct checkpoints along the Southern border to bridge the gap to long-term permanent checkpoints; and (6) to provide assistance to U.S. Customs and

Border Protection, particularly in rural, high-trafficked areas, as designated by the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

 (d) MATERIEL AND LOGISTICAL SUPPORT.—The Secretary of Defense shall deploy such materiel and equipment and logistical support as may be necessary to ensure success of the operations and missions conducted by the National Guard under this section.

 (e) EXCLUSION FROM NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL STRENGTH LIMITATIONS.—National Guard personnel deployed under subsection (a) shall not be included in— (1) the calculation to determine compliance with limits on end strength for National Guard personnel; or (2) limits on the number of National Guard personnel that may be placed on active duty for operational support under section 115 of title 10, United States Code

 SEC. 1106. EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY.

(a) ENHANCEMENTS.—The Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, working through U.S. Border Patrol, shall— (1) deploy additional mobile, video, and agent-portable surveillance systems, and unmanned aerial vehicles in the Southwest Border region as necessary to provide 24-hour operation and surveillance; (2) operate unarmed unmanned aerial vehicles along the Southern border for 24 hours per day and

for 7 days per week; (3) deploy unarmed additional fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters along the Southern border; EAS13500 S.L.C. (4) acquire new rotocraft and make upgrades to the existing helicopter fleet; and (5) increase horse patrols in the Southwest Border region.

 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—In addition to amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated, there is authorized to be appropriated to U.S. Customs and Border Protection such sums as may be necessary to carry out subsection (a) during fiscal years 2014 through 2018.

Share and “Like” the story below.   Follow The Shark Tank on Twitter and Facebook 

Tell us what you think, leave a comment below .



About author

Javier Manjarres

As the managing editor of The Shark Tank, Javier was awarded the 2011 CPAC Blogger of the Year. Countless videos and articles from the Shark Tank have been featured on Fox News, The Hill, Wall Street Journal, and other national news publications. Javier has also appeared on Univision’s “Al Punto” and numerous radio shows, including being the weekly 92.5 Fox News' DayBreak with Drew Steele political contributor, as well as one of NewsmaxTV's conservative commentators.

Related Articles

  • Greg

    Boy, that sounds like a loser! What idiots dreamed this up?

    • OldmanRick

      The progressive gang of eight.

    • DidITweetThat

      Actually it is all the fearful crazies on the RIGHT that are so afraid of the brown men stealing their jobs that have our military moving to the border.

      When they screamed “we should secure our border” where did they think they were going to get all of those boots and equipment?

      As far as the National Guard is concerned, this would not be an unusual role… ACTUALLY it would be less unusual than sending them to IRAQ for a War for Oil and GOP War = Stimulus plan. The National Guard is supposed to work on a state level to be ready to aid the country in times of need.

      Here is the National Guards Recruitment poster.

      http://www.military.com/join-armed-forces/national-guard-mission-values.html

      It cracks me up how well the Alex Jones and the GOP stir the fears of the so easily led.

  • C Solis

    So, they are using the ‘state militia’ to enforce or not enforce federal laws to suit their own selves. Who pays for the troops that a state (Army National Guard/Air National Guard) provides to DHS? I wouldn’t be in the least bit surprised if the state military doesn’t get buried via bullets in the back.

  • lowie

    This bill is nothing more than a vote buying bill that allows amnesty and expands government. It also ignores the spending caps that Congress already passed. In other words, the Senate and the Executive branch are telling us it’s going to cost the working class lots more in taxes. We the people can stop this by getting out the vote to fill every vacancy of the Senate and House of Representatives with people who want to protect the Republic from these radicals who sit on both sides of the aisle.

  • BoGo

    “So, if authorized by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, it would be up to Governors Perry of Texas, Jan Brewer of Arizona, and Martinez of New Mexico, to deploy their state’s respective national guard units to the border region.”

    Javier – it looks like you’ve already written off California. Are you declaring the Reconquista of Cali complete?

    • http://www.shark-tank.net Javier Manjarres

      Yup! California is down for the count! ahahahaha

  • OldmanRick

    When can a Sec of Defense overrule a governor of a solemn state? Seems like an infringement on States’ Rights.

  • Ron Bedell

    Homeland Security is 100% unconstitutional and it needs to be abolished immediately!

  • Florida Jim

    Janet Napolitano is not fit for office and she has lied about Benghazi, gun running in Mexico, border failures and now the muslim terrorists in Boston along with the young Saudi boy she tried to fly home but Glen Beck stopped her. She lies about the Boston muslim terrorists by their bombs, their support which she says there is none but how did unemployed people afford the bombs, the expensive guns and the automobiles they drove?
    she lies as bad as her Obama.

  • Chopper

    Don’t everybody get your thongs in a wad. This has been going on for a long time. As long as the troops are used only for intelligence and construction mission, there is nothing here to get excited about. The problem arises if they are used in a law enforcement manner. That is a violation of Posse Comitatus and would be a concern to all citizens. It could be a tiny step towards getting us accustomed to military law enforcement which could lead to martial law.

    The big point here is that this Act is trying to use all assets available to secure the border. To have the military sitting on their collective thumbs while illegals pour across the border due to a lack of Border Patrol intelligence gathering and construction assets is insanity.

    I am not a fan of the immigration bill but in this instance, it appears that the Loco Ocho are trying to give us what we have been begging for for years.